CHAdeMO vs NACS Charging Standards: Which is More Suitable for Your Electric Vehicle?

As an electric vehicle owner or potential owner, it’s essential to understand the different charging standards. Currently, the North American market is dominated by two fast-charging standards: CHAdeMO and NACS. They have distinct differences in interface design, charging performance, and user experience. Let’s explore the characteristics and differences between these two charging standards.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

Charging Interface Design Compariso

The most obvious difference lies in the physical interface design. CHAdeMO uses a square connector, which is larger and requires two hands to plug and unplug. This design originated in Japan, emphasizing safety and stability. In contrast, Tesla’s NACS interface is more compact and smooth, making it easier to handle and plug in with one hand, providing a more user-friendly experience.

In daily use, NACS has a significant advantage in terms of portability. Many car owners have reported that CHAdeMO charging guns are heavier and less friendly to users with limited strength, especially in cold weather. The distribution of the two interfaces on public charging pillars is also becoming increasingly different, with newer charging stations more likely to install NACS interfaces.

Difference in Charging Performance

From a technical perspective, CHAdeMO supports up to 400kW of charging power, while NACS can also reach similar levels. However, in actual use, NACS often provides a more stable charging experience and better temperature management. Multiple tests have shown that under the same conditions, NACS can charge from 20% to 80% about 8-10 minutes faster than CHAdeMO.

The charging curve performance also differs. CHAdeMO slows down significantly when the battery is almost full to protect the battery health, while NACS can maintain higher power for a longer time. In cold environments, NACS’s temperature management system is more efficient, with a decrease in charging speed about 30% less than CHAdeMO.

Comparison of Convenience

In daily use, NACS has the following advantages:

No need to purchase or rent a dedicated charging gun Lower fault rate and easier troubleshooting More intelligent error detection and recovery functions The charging cable that comes with the vehicle can be adapted to most charging stations In contrast, CHAdeMO users may need to pay an additional fee for charging gun rental (about $2-3 per use), and the probability of encountering a “locked” charging gun fault is slightly higher.

Conclusion and Outlook

In summary, NACS is rapidly becoming the mainstream choice in the North American electric vehicle market, with its excellent user experience, efficient charging performance, and extensive infrastructure support being its greatest advantages. CHAdeMO, as a once-important standard, may gradually exit the North American market, but it will still maintain its position in specific markets such as Japan.

When purchasing a new vehicle, it’s recommended to prioritize models that adopt the NACS standard, which can provide better assurance for future charging experiences. Even if you choose a CHAdeMO model, it’s best to confirm that it can be compatible with NACS charging stations through an adapter to ensure long-term worry-free use.

YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/@olinkevse

OLINK : https://olinkevse.com/